8RENT / COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

Competitive analysis for car rental company 8rent

Competitive analysis before fleet investment

Before 8rent launched, we analysed five competitors and 850 pricing variants to separate the headline rental price from the actual rental conditions and identify room for differentiation.

Strategy, brand and conversion

00 / Starting situation

8rent was preparing to launch a car rental business in Magdeburg. Before setting its own prices, packages and communication, it needed to understand how competitors structure their offers and which elements actually determine value for the customer.

01 / SCOPE

Five competitors and 850 pricing variants before launch

Before 8rent launched, we analysed SIXT, Enterprise, Europcar, Harms and MotionDrive. We compared not only brand communication and offer presentation, but also how customers were guided through vehicle selection, insurance, additional services and loyalty programmes.

The qualitative review was complemented by a database of 850 pricing variants for Magdeburg, allowing us to examine competitors through real combinations of rental conditions rather than a single price list.

02 / MAIN CHALLENGE

The same daily rate does not mean the same offer

In car rental, the amount shown next to a vehicle is only the entry point. The final cost and attractiveness of a rental change with the date, booking length, mileage allowance, insurance, extras and the rules around the specific vehicle.

A simple price comparison would therefore have produced misleading conclusions. We first had to determine what the customer actually receives for a given amount and at which stage additional costs or restrictions appear.

03 / PRICING DATA

We built a grid of rental scenarios

The pricing database contained 850 variants: 826 SIXT quotes and 24 Europcar quotes. It covered passenger and commercial vehicles, rental periods of 1, 7, 14 and 30 days, different dates and assigned mileage limits.

This approach showed how an offer changed when its conditions changed, instead of drawing conclusions from a single promotional rate. We did not calculate an artificial average across all records because the price unit was not fully comparable in every variant. The relationship between price and the structure of each offer was more important.

04 / INSURANCE AND EXTRAS

We checked where the base price ends

We traced how insurance, surcharges and additional packages were presented. We were interested not only in how much they cost, but also when the customer sees the cost, what is actually included in the base price and how each subsequent choice changes an initially attractive offer.

This separated two levels of competition: the vehicle rate itself and the transparency of the entire purchasing process. Both matter to a new rental company because customers compare not only the number in the price list, but also the risk that the final amount will differ from what they expected.

ANALYSIS AND STRATEGY

Before setting the offer, check how the market actually works

We analyse prices, conditions, communication and competitive mechanisms so decisions about a new business come from comparable data rather than isolated examples.

Talk to us about an analysis

06 / CERTAINTY OF CHOICE

“This model or similar” is also part of the price

One of the more interesting findings was the difference between reserving a vehicle class and guaranteeing a specific model. In some offers, customers selected a car described as “this model or similar”, while other solutions increased certainty about what would actually be available at pickup.

The same applied to surcharges that guaranteed specific equipment. This showed that offer value does not have to come solely from a lower rate. It can also come from answering a very practical customer question: what exactly will I get for my money?

07 / OFFER IMPLICATIONS

We looked for an advantage in predictability

Combining pricing analysis with the competitors’ communication suggested a possible direction for 8rent: a clearer offer and more predictable rental conditions.

This did not mean a simple “we will be cheaper” message. It meant deliberate decisions about what to show immediately, what to include in a package, which extras to keep optional and how to describe the car, mileage allowance and insurance protection so the customer can genuinely compare offers.

This was a direction to use when designing the offer — the sources do not confirm its later implementation or any sales result.

08 / RESULT

8rent could design its offer around market mechanisms

Before launch, the company received an organised reference point for decisions about pricing, packages and communication. The analysis showed which elements make rental offers difficult to compare, where competitors move costs beyond the headline price and how much value can come from certainty about the vehicle and rental conditions.

The result was decision-making documentation for designing the offer — without pretending that a single rate in a price list describes the whole market.

S.09 / ContactEnquiry / similar challenge

What in this case resembles your situation?

Describe the similarity and the result you need. We will not assume that the same scope is the right answer.

  1. 1Conversation scopeCurrent step
  2. 2Context
  3. 3Budget and timing
  4. 4Contact

We respond with a concrete recommendation by the end of the next business day.

Step 1 / 4

Which outcome matters most?